← Back to research
Post hoc analysis of randomized clinical trialPubMedJAMA Cardiology

Cardiorenal Outcomes With Tirzepatide Compared With Dulaglutide in Patients With Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: SURPASS-CVOT

Nissen SE, Wolski K, D'Alessio D, Weerakkody G, Kiljanski J, Wiese RJ, Pavo I, Cariou B, Nicholls SJ

Summary

In a post hoc analysis of the landmark SURPASS-CVOT trial (n=13,165), tirzepatide demonstrated a 16% relative risk reduction in a composite 6-component cardiorenal endpoint compared to dulaglutide (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.90, p<0.001). The benefit extended across all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, and adverse kidney outcomes over a median 47-month follow-up.

Clinical Significance

This is the first head-to-head comparison showing dual GIP/GLP-1 agonism (tirzepatide) provides superior cardiorenal protection versus GLP-1 agonism alone (dulaglutide) in patients with established CVD. The findings strengthen the case for tirzepatide as a preferred incretin-based therapy in high-risk patients and may influence treatment guidelines for cardiometabolic risk reduction.

Pesquisa Relacionada